Skip to main content

Lifecycle Map

Supply-chain-security assurance is not a single event. It changes as products move from design to sourcing, manufacturing, provisioning, logistics, acceptance, deployment, update, repair, transfer, and decommissioning. Evidence changes too: some evidence establishes origin, some verifies current state, some supports update and vulnerability response, and some proves lifecycle decisions after acceptance.

Lifecycle Evidence Matrix

Lifecycle stageMain decisionCommon failure modesExample evidenceRelated pages
DesignWhat trust assumptions and controls are required?Missing threat model, unclear trust boundaries, unmanaged supplier assumptionsThreat model, security requirements, component criteriaRisks & Practices
SourcingAre suppliers and components acceptable?Opaque sub-tiers, unsupported components, counterfeit riskSupplier evidence, provenance, certifications, component recordsProcurement & Supplier Assurance
ManufacturingWas the product built as expected?Substitution, unauthorized changes, poor build traceabilityManufacturing records, identity injection records, Platform CertificatesIdentity & Provenance
ProvisioningWas identity or credential material created correctly?Weak key handling, cloned credentials, unbound identitiesDevice identity records, credential issuance logs, trust-anchor recordsTrust Anchors
LogisticsWas chain of custody preserved?Tampering, loss of provenance, uncontrolled reseller pathProvenance records, transfer records, custody logsProduct Acceptance
AcceptanceIs the delivered item genuine and in expected state?Counterfeit device, firmware drift, unverifiable claimsIdentity, provenance, integrity, attestation evidenceProduct Acceptance
DeploymentIs the product connected to approved services and policy?Wrong service binding, insecure configuration, unmanaged baselineOnboarding records, policy checks, configuration evidenceLifecycle Monitoring
UpdateWere updates authorized, delivered, installed, and recoverable?Unauthorized update, failed rollback, missing update historyUpdate records, version history, rollback evidenceUpdate & Vulnerability
RepairWas trust restored or re-established?Component replacement without new evidence, stale credentialsRepair records, re-provisioning evidence, delta certificatesLifecycle State & Audit
TransferCan trust be reassigned or verified?Ownership ambiguity, stale access, missing custody recordsOwnership records, lifecycle-state records, revocation recordsRetention & Reuse
DecommissioningWas the asset retired safely?Live credentials, recoverable data, unrevoked servicesRevocation, wipe, cryptographic erase, retirement logsLifecycle State & Audit

How To Use The Map

  1. Identify the lifecycle stage where the decision is being made.
  2. Name the failure mode that would make the decision unsafe.
  3. Select the practice or control that should reduce the risk.
  4. Ask what evidence would show that the control operated.
  5. Decide whether the evidence must be retained, refreshed, or re-verified after the decision.
  6. Map supporting standards or technologies only where they clarify implementation or verification options.

Lifecycle Questions

Questions to ask suppliers

  • Which lifecycle stages do your evidence records cover?
  • What happens to evidence after update, repair, transfer, or decommissioning?
  • Can evidence be refreshed, revoked, superseded, or re-issued?
  • Who can verify lifecycle-state changes and with what trust anchor?

Questions to ask internally

  • Which teams rely on evidence after acceptance?
  • Where do we currently lose traceability?
  • What evidence must survive ownership transfer or repair?
  • Which lifecycle events require new acceptance checks?

Questions to ask assessors / auditors

  • Can evidence be traced to the lifecycle stage, event, product scope, and decision it supports?
  • Are updates, repairs, transfers, exceptions, and decommissioning actions reflected in retained records?
  • Is stale, superseded, revoked, or missing evidence visible during review?

Questions to ask implementers

  • Which systems generate lifecycle events and evidence updates?
  • How will product identity, version state, ownership, repair, and retirement status be correlated?
  • What workflow triggers re-verification when lifecycle state changes?